19.9 C
Byron Shire
March 28, 2024

Turnbull’s energy plan a disaster for renewables, climate and prices

Latest News

Splendour 2024 cancelled

It's official, Splendour in the Grass 2024 has been cancelled.

Other News

Superbowls

Superbowls is your go-to spot for a burst of woodfired flavour! Nestled in Byron Arts and Industry Estate, the...

Could the future of the Richmond River be a clean and healthy one?

Imagine a drinkable, swimmable, fishable Richmond River? That is the aim of the Richmond Riverkeepers Association.

Mandy Nolan’s Soapbox: Why Being Seen is Beautiful

There is something profound about being seen. Being accepted and loved for exactly who you are. It’s life changing. It’s simple. It’s transformative. But some people don’t get to experience this. Nearly half of transgender Australians have attempted suicide.That data tells the very real impact of discrimination, stigma and lack of access to gender-affirming surgery. I write this as a woman who was born a woman, who identifies as a woman. I’ll admit, that even in that gender role, that fits within the societal binary, I’ve had my own challenges.

The Picture House is turning 8

It feels like we were only just ringing in the new year days ago and here we are approaching Easter weekend at The Brunswick Picture House. It’s already been a whirlwind start to 2024 with their biggest and busiest program so far, bringing an eclectic mix of some of the hottest stand-up comedy, music gigs, film screenings and cabaret – and that was just last week!

A seasoned bard

Guy Kachel had an idyllic entry to the world of music. Born in Tamworth, he was raised on the banks of the Peel River. The landscape was a fertile ground for his imagination. Seeing this rustic world change, as Tamworth developed into an inland city and friends grew to sometimes troubled adulthoods, provided insights for the artistry that later powered his career as a performer.

Adaptive Surf Pro winds up in Byron

A week of mixed weather had seen almost 100 adaptive surfers take on the beaches of Byron Bay in the Byron first international adaptive surfing event to be held in Australia – the 2024 Australian Pro.

Australia's government is not a supporter of renewable energy. Photo Vattenfall/flickr.com

By Giles Parkinson, www.reneweconomy.com.au

On the face of it a twin-pronged system focusing on reliability and environmental outcomes could have appeal. But we just don’t know because the details of Malcolm Turnbull’s National Energy Guarantee (NEG), and even the basics of how it will work, have not been explained.

As one clean energy advocate said on Tuesday: ‘We’re still trying to understand whether we love or hate the NEG’. Part of that hesitation is based around the oft-made assumption that it might be better to have something, rather than nothing. But that remains to be seen.

The mainstream media certainly embraced it, but analysts see red flags all over the place – it is potentially bad news for renewables, bad news for emissions, and bad news for prices. It is potentially Turnbull’s energy trilemma turned upside down.

Most of all, the proposal appears to be the most ill-considered, poorly detailed and potentially useless policy that anyone can remember – the work of Australia’s so-called ‘energy mafia’ hungry to defend the power of the incumbent oligopoly, commercial interests and their ideology.

Here’s a list of reasons why people should be concerned.

Did anyone tell the Coalition party room that this is a de-facto carbon price?

Energy analysts say it is a little early to tell, because there are no actual details, but it looks variously like a emissions intensity scheme, which Turnbull has been pushing for in various forms since 2008, or a mix of a baseline and credit scheme and a capacity market.

Market analysts Reputex describe it is a de-facto carbon price. ‘The attributes of the NEG will, in effect, establish a de-facto price on greenhouse gas emissions from the power sector, and provide a robust source of demand for Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCU),’ it says.

Little wonder, then, that Tony Abbott is not impressed. ‘Tony is a conscientious objector,’ says energy minister Josh Frydenberg. But he’ll apparently hold his tongue for the moment.

But this carbon price will be invisible

Not only will it be a de-facto carbon price, it will also be invisible,  because the ‘market’ will be hidden by the complexity of energy price caps and hedges. That is a major concern.

There is absolutely no transparency in this market, which is why the big gen-tailers are in favour of it, because it hands them absolute control and discretion over the market and investments.

The scheme will, ostensibly, be monitored by the same useless regulators that allowed the networks – and latterly the generators and retailers – to gouge consumers over the last 10 years, and enabled them, more recently, to ‘play’ the market for certificates in the renewable energy target.

It’s hardly reassuring for the consumer. The power of the energy oligopoly is simply reinforced.

The emissions target are manifestly inadequate

The emissions reduction target that the ESB was asked to work with – a 26 per cent cut in electricity emissions from 2005 levels by 2030 – is manifestly inadequate, for even Australia’s current climate commitment (it loads a lot of effort on to other sectors), but also to the ultimate goal of capping global warming well below 2°C.

Even Origin Energy recognises this, noting the cavernous gap between the Paris target and the current emissions trajectory, a trajectory made worse by the government’s hint that any emissions targets will be ‘back-ended’ to 2030.

But as with Finkel, the low target might be deliberate, so as not to scare the horses and the climate deniers. (Note the IPA came out again on Tuesday and argued for no emission cuts).

Had Finkel couched his review in terms of what needed to be done, like the Climate Change Authority, his conclusion would likely have been a renewables share approaching 70 per cent by 2030, not the 42 per cent in his document.

And those emissions targets may have been largely met, already

The big question is how much new investment the scheme will pull in. Not a lot. That’s because, as David Leitch tells us, the current build-out of renewables under the renewable energy target, and the closure of the Hazelwood power station has already got the country much of the way there.

Leitch says that, on his numbers, only around 4,000MW of new large-scale renewables would be required between 2020 and 2030 to meet the current emissions target. That’s not much. The scheme would only work if there were serious reduction targets. And he doesn’t hold out much hope of that, in the current political environment.

Worse, he notes of Snowy 2.0: ‘(The government) is funding a very expensive project designed to supply a reliability rule that they have expressly forced onto retailers. In essence it is making a rule that requires retailers to buy the output from its own project. The mafia would approve.’

It could mean zero additions to large-scale renewables

Even Leitch’s analysis could be optimistic. The advice from the ESB suggests a range of 28-36 per cent renewables by 2030, and 18-24 per cent wind and solar share. This estimate includes rooftop solar, according to ESB chair Kerry Schott.

Given the anticipated, and one would suspect, unstoppable uptake of rooftop solar by households and businesses in response to high power prices that are not coming down, it means that at the bottom end of their range, the ESB is predicting virtually no new wind and solar projects in the country between 2020 and 2030.

And given that anticipated surge in rooftop solar, even the top end of the forecast allows for little in the way of new renewables, which seems extraordinary given the recognition by Schott and even the Coalition about the falling cost of wind and solar.

Fancy investing in a Peru landfill gas mine rather than an Australia wind farm?

The market component even has an international flavour. The advice from the ESB includes the possibility of retailers meeting their environmental obligations through international credits.

That likely means that rather than investing in an Australian wind or solar farm, the likes of Origin, AGL and EnergyAustralia could invest in a third-world project that generates cheap credits – like the Peruvian landfill gas plant and other facilities supported by the UN’s Clean Development Mechanism that small retailer PowerShop invests in so it can claim to be ‘carbon neutral’.

And it may not lead to investment certainty

Many are defending the NEG on the basis that any sort of policy is better than nothing. That reminds us of Turnbull’s last major achievement, the bastardisation of the CPRS before he was rolled by Abbott in 2009.

Morgan Stanley’s Rob Koh notes that, on the detail presented so far, the government will set emissions reductions pathway (rather than that being done by an independent body).

‘The risk of political interference in the targets may reduce investor confidence in the scheme, particularly where there is no explicit linkage to Australia’s Paris Agreement commitments,’ Koh writes. And because no one else has done this sort of scheme, it will inevitably have to be fine-tuned.

The price cuts are trivial, so consumers will find own way with solar and storage

The promised price reductions of around $100 a year have not been modelled, may be as low as 50c a week, and may just be a figment of Pierce’s imagination. It just hasn’t been modelled. Given the absurdly high price of electricity in Australia and the competing forces of rooftop solar and storage, that offers nothing to consumers.

‘Regardless of what Turnbull and his mates decide, shaving between $25-$100 off someone’s bill is meaningless compared to the difference that behind the meter PV, storage and demand management can make,’ says Adrian Merrick from EnergyLocals.

‘While they focus on gaining votes from policy headlines, we’re quietly making the change a reality.’ Tomorrow, on One Step Off The Grid, another example will be published of how consumers will do this.

What does it mean for the states?

No one is too sure. The Labor states have targets ranging from 40 per cent by 2025 (Victoria), to 50 per cent by 2030 (Queensland and the NT) and 100% by 2020 (ACT). South Australia is already at more than 50 per cent.

But after what has been described as a testy phone hook-up between Frydenberg and the state ministers, the states say they have been gobsmacked by the lack of detail, and the apparent back-flip by the Coalition, who having once damned the states for ‘going it alone’ now want them to do the heavy lifting.

The Coalition needs state approval for the changes, because they involve alterations to the market rules.

A victory for the energy mafia?

This is the question everyone is asking. An eight-page letter with no detail and some fuzzy ideas, ostensibly from the Energy Security Board, comprising two new independent directors (Schott and Clare Savage) and the heads of AEMO, AEMC and the AER.

This is the sort of scheme that the energy oligopoly and their attendants in various consultancies and think tanks (some call them the energy mafia) have been busting to do for years. See our first point about the lack of transparency in the markets and the control by the incumbents.

And all fingers are pointing to John Pierce, the head of the AEMC, the rule-maker that has fought so hard against renewable targets, and rule changes, and has been a staunch defender of fossil fuel markets.

He appears to have seized an opportunity, with impeccable timing, and was clearly joined by key players in the major utilities who have been quick to give their imprimatur. There is a body of opinion in the energy market that Pierce has outflanked his rivals and peers.

It was noticeable that Turnbull deflected to Pierce during the various briefing – indeed, Turnbull has been using the heads of the various agencies as some sort of human shield to deflect attacks, defending the policy’s expediency through their ‘expertise’.

Schott further added to this view of the role of Pierce, suggesting it was the culmination of a ‘year of work’. But the ESB only met for the first time a month ago. And the only member of the ESB ‘around for years’ is Pierce.

And the states found it passing strange that the ESB, which is supposed to be part of COAG, had made no approach to the states. ‘There are real questions about the process,’ said ACT minister Shane Rattenbury.

Schott’s quick change on renewables

The fact that the heads of the other agencies were willing to put their names on such a vague document has surprised many in the industry, particularly in the case of Schott, admired for being a no-nonsence administrator.

Here, Schott has signed her name to a document apparently condemning renewables to zero or limited growth in the next decade. Yet it was just a few months ago that Schott was chair of Transgrid, a major transmission company that said decarbonising the grid with a very high penetration of renewables was not only doable within a few decades, but would also lower prices.

See this story Transgrid: 100% renewables is feasible and affordable. That’s not the story that the ESB is telling us now. What do they know that the boffins at the networks and the CSIRO do not?

Is AEMO confusing the role of system security and dispatchability?

The role of AEMO is also curious. On Tuesday at the behest of the prime minister, AEMO CEO Audrey Zibelman talked about the recent interventions by AEMO into the South Australia market, which included limiting the amount of wind if not enough gas generation was present.

But this immediately raised questions about what these interventions – largely about the level of ‘fault current’ – have got to do with dispatchability and the recommendations of the ESB. The CEC’s policy wonk, Tom Butler, tweeted this after the Tuesday press conference:

There is normally plenty of dispatchable generation in South Australia, it’s just that the plant operators have to be given a boot up the backside by the market operator to switch them on. System security is one thing, dispatchability is another. It is not clear how the NEG would address that.

We asked AEMO and were advised to talk to the ESB. But, we said, the ESB is just the heads of the agencies, of which AEMO is one. Finally we got a reply:

‘The NEG provides the opportunity to signal what the system requires to ensure reliability. AEMO has been consistent in its position that we require a portfolio of resources that meet all the objectives (such as frequency, inertia, voltage control etc) to maintain power system security and reliability.’

They suggested we talk to Schott. But Schott’s office said that wasn’t possible until next week at the earliest.

Twitter @gilesparkinson

 

 


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

We just love him!

If you’re over 50 you might not be a fan of Tom Jones, but you can bet your mum is. If you’re under 40 you might not even know who he is, but your grandmother probably wet her pants at the mere mention of his name.

Peter Garrett gives Bluesfest the nod

If I say the words ‘US Forces give the nod’, I can pretty much guarantee that you will hear the unmistakable voice of Peter Garrett ringing in your ears. Your head may even start to bob up and down a bit. 

Save Wallum finalist in NSW 2024 environment awards

The Save Wallum campaign has been named as a finalist in the Nature Conservation Council of NSW Environment Awards 2024. The award ceremony will be held in Sydney tonight, and Save Wallum spokesperson and ecologist James Barrie will be attending with Tegan Kitt, another founding member of the group.

New report highlights gaps in rural and remote health

The second annual Royal Flying Doctor Service ‘Best for the Bush, Rural and remote Health Base Line’ report has just been released. Presenting the latest data on the health of rural and remote Australians and evidence on service gaps, it identifies issues in urgent need of attention from service providers, funders, partners and policy makers.